Substitute Senate Bill 5025 as Recommended by Law & Justice

Source

Section 1

The legislature finds that:

  1. Strong consumer protection and antitrust penalties are critical to protecting consumers and ensuring a fair marketplace;

  2. Strong penalties ensure accountability, deter violations, and ensure a level playing field for businesses;

  3. Washington currently does not provide strong penalties for violations of the state's consumer protection act, which prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of competition;

  4. Washington's penalty for unfair or deceptive acts or practices has not kept pace with inflation, and has not increased since 1970;

  5. Washington's penalty for unfair methods of competition has also not kept pace with inflation, and has not increased since 1983;

  6. Consequently, Washington has one of the lowest consumer protection penalties in the United States;

  7. Twenty-four state legislatures representing more than 200 million Americans have passed enhanced penalties for violations that target or impact certain vulnerable populations, but Washington does not have an enhanced penalty;

  8. Many Washingtonians are hurting financially due to the impacts of the global pandemic;

  9. Washington's weak penalties place Washington consumers at greater risk; and

  10. Washingtonians deserve strong consumer protections to ensure entities that illegally, unfairly, and deceptively go after their hard-earned dollars are held accountable.

Section 2

This section modifies existing section 19.86.140. Here is the modified chapter for context.

Every person who shall violate the terms of any injunction issued as in this chapter provided, shall forfeit and pay a civil penalty of not more than $215,000.

Every individual who violates RCW 19.86.030 or 19.86.040 shall pay a civil penalty of not more than $260,000. Every person, other than an individual, who violates RCW 19.86.030 or 19.86.040 shall pay a civil penalty of not more than $1,300,000.

Every person who violates RCW 19.86.020 shall forfeit and pay a civil penalty of not more than $13,350 for each violation: PROVIDED, That nothing in this paragraph shall apply to any radio or television broadcasting station which broadcasts, or to any publisher, printer or distributor of any newspaper, magazine, billboard or other advertising medium who publishes, prints or distributes, advertising in good faith without knowledge of its false, deceptive or misleading character.

For unlawful acts or practices that target or impact specific individuals or communities based on demographic characteristics including, but not limited to, age, race, national origin, citizenship or immigration status, sex, sexual orientation, presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, religion, veteran status, or status as a member of the armed forces, as that term is defined in 10 U.S.C. Sec. 101, an enhanced penalty of $10,000 shall apply.

For the purpose of this section the superior court issuing any injunction shall retain jurisdiction, and the cause shall be continued, and in such cases the attorney general acting in the name of the state may petition for the recovery of civil penalties.

With respect to violations of RCW 19.86.030 and 19.86.040, the attorney general, acting in the name of the state, may seek recovery of such penalties in a civil action.

Section 3

This section modifies existing section 4.16.160. Here is the modified chapter for context.

The limitations prescribed in this chapter shall apply to actions brought in the name or for the benefit of any county or other municipality or quasimunicipality of the state, in the same manner as to actions brought by private parties: PROVIDED, That, except as provided in RCW 4.16.310, there shall be no limitation to actions brought in the name or for the benefit of the state, and no claim of right predicated upon the lapse of time shall ever be asserted against the state**, including actions asserting a claim for civil penalties under RCW 19.86.140**: AND FURTHER PROVIDED, That no previously existing statute of limitations shall be interposed as a defense to any action brought in the name or for the benefit of the state, although such statute may have run and become fully operative as a defense prior to February 27, 1903, nor shall any cause of action against the state be predicated upon such a statute.

Section 4

This act may be known and cited as the consumer protection improvement act.


Created by @tannewt. Contribute on GitHub.